Cracking Down on Vaccinations

A handful of US states are enacting laws that make it harder for parents to opt out of vaccinating their children against infectious diseases.

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

Image: United States Department of Health and Human ServicesState legislatures across the US are trying to increase the number of children who receive vaccinations against disease by enacting laws that make opting out of those shots tougher for parents. California, Vermont, and Washington—states that allow parents to decline scheduled vaccinations for their children for personal or philosophical reasons—require parents opting out to provide proof that a health-care practitioner or representative of the state's health department gave them scientific information about the risks and benefits of those vaccinations. State lawmakers in New Jersey and Arizona have floated ideas for similar legislation.

Even in the face of recent outbreaks of whooping cough and other diseases, vaccine exemption rates are rising across the nation. An average of 1.5 percent of US children entering kindergarten in 2010-2011 had an exemption, and rates in some states are even higher. "There really is a problem when you don't have herd immunity so that you can stop the infectious diseases," Washington Senator Karen Keiser (D) told Nature. The problem risks becoming worse in states, such as Kansas, Mississippi, Massachusetts, South Dakota, and West Virginia, that have recently tried to enact laws that permit philosophical exemptions. But states that have strengthened exemption requirements are already seeing positive results. Washington, for example, has seen kindergarten exemption rates drop to 4.5 percent this year from ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Bob Grant

    From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
iStock

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Thermo Fisher Logo
Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Unchained Labs
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

fujirebio-square-logo

Fujirebio Receives Marketing Clearance for Lumipulse® G pTau 217/ β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio In-Vitro Diagnostic Test

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours