FDA mulls embryonic stem cell therapy

With biotech companies inching up on clinical trials for human embryonic stem cell-based therapies, the US Food and Drug Administration held a meeting yesterday to discuss scientific issues in properly deriving and characterizing the cells, as well as appropriate clinical trial monitoring. Three biotechs, Geron Corporation, Advanced Cell Technology, and Novocell presented some of their scientific work on spinal cord injury, vision impairment, and diabetes, respectively, at the meeting. Geron

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
With biotech companies inching up on clinical trials for human embryonic stem cell-based therapies, the US Food and Drug Administration held a meeting yesterday to discuss scientific issues in properly deriving and characterizing the cells, as well as appropriate clinical trial monitoring. Three biotechs, Geron Corporation, Advanced Cell Technology, and Novocell presented some of their scientific work on spinal cord injury, vision impairment, and diabetes, respectively, at the meeting. Geron and Advanced Cell Technology are hoping to begin testing therapies of cells derived from human embryonic stem cells sometime this year, according to linkurl:Bloomberg News.;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ack_39N6i50U&refer=us Jane Lebkowski, senior vice president of regenerative medicine at Geron Corporation, told The Scientist she could not comment on whether this was true. "The science was ready to have this kind of discussion, to make sure clinical trials are safe," Celia Witten, spokesperson for the FDA told a group of reporters after the day-long meeting, though she declined to say whether the agency has yet received any Investigational New Drug applications. The advisory committee, which was made up of 25 independent scientists and FDA researchers, addressed issues of proper animal studies for preclinical testing and how researchers can control the linkurl:embryonic stem cells;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/daily/53224/ for appropriate differentiation -- that is, so they don't form cancerous teratomas. "There was a lot discussed in the range of things we're already thinking about," Lebkowski told The Scientist. "And several ideas we've been implementing already." Some of the committee's ideas were rather extreme, she added; some of the large animal model studies in non-human primates or pigs that the committee discussed were not very practical and extremely complicated -- the committee mused aloud whether allograft experiments (for example, pig embryonic stem cells transplanted to pig body) should be conducted before transplanting human embryonic stem cells to different species. Several committee members noted that guidelines and requirements of human embryonic stem cell-based therapies will vary from disease to disease, and cell product to cell product. However, all the members seemed to agree that a common, standardized assay should be developed to determine the tumorigenicity of a specific cell product. linkurl:Kenneth Chein,;http://www.hms.harvard.edu/dms/bbs/fac/Chien.html from Harvard Medical School, noted that transplanting linkurl:cardiomyocites;http://www.the-scientist.com/2006/8/1/34/1/ and other types of differentiated embryonic stem cells has yielded linkurl:mixed efficacy;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/23141/ results so far, requiring that more definitive assays need to be developed for efficacy and safety. The committee also addressed how researchers and clinicians will be able to control and monitor where the cells go once they are administered. While new technologies such as reporter genes may improve researchers' ability to track transplanted cells, some committee members questioned whether new techniques should be used at the same time as therapeutic embryonic stem cells, which itself is a novel type of therapy. Some members of the committee said they were uneasy about embryonic stem cell therapies, and the committee discussed the potential of developing failsafe mechanisms in the cell products, like suicide genes. But some noted that such approaches may have their own therapeutic complications and risks.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Andrea Gawrylewski

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
TS Digest January 2025
January 2025, Issue 1

Why Do Some People Get Drunk Faster Than Others?

Genetics and tolerance shake up how alcohol affects each person, creating a unique cocktail of experiences.

View this Issue
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino
New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

Biotium logo
Learn How 3D Cell Cultures Advance Tissue Regeneration

Organoids as a Tool for Tissue Regeneration Research 

Acro 

Products

Artificial Inc. Logo

Artificial Inc. proof-of-concept data demonstrates platform capabilities with NVIDIA’s BioNeMo

Sapient Logo

Sapient Partners with Alamar Biosciences to Extend Targeted Proteomics Services Using NULISA™ Assays for Cytokines, Chemokines, and Inflammatory Mediators

Bio-Rad Logo

Bio-Rad Extends Range of Vericheck ddPCR Empty-Full Capsid Kits to Optimize AAV Vector Characterization

Scientist holding a blood sample tube labeled Mycoplasma test in front of many other tubes containing patient samples

Accelerating Mycoplasma Testing for Targeted Therapy Development