Skip to main content

Molecular Motors

Researchers control nanomotors inside living cells.

Written byAbby Olena, PhD
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00

MALLOUK LAB, PENN STATE UNIVERSITYManipulating tiny machines inside the body for diagnosing or treating illness is a goal that medicine has not yet achieved, but new research takes scientists one step closer. A team from Penn State University has safely manipulated nanomotors in living cells, according to a study published online today (February 12) in Angewandte Chemie.

“Our first-generation motors required toxic fuels and they would not move in biological fluid, so we couldn’t study them in human cells,” project leader Thomas Mallouk said in a statement. “That limitation was a serious problem.”

Mallouk and his colleagues addressed this issue by creating the nanomotors out of gold rods—approximately 300 nanometers in diameter and three microns long—and powering them using ultrasound, which at low power is non-toxic. They incubated the nanomotors with HeLa cells, which internalized the motors after about 24 hours. The researchers used low-power ultrasound to make the nanomotors move and spin and controlled their directionality using magnets. After, they showed that the cells were still viable. When the researchers used ultrasound at higher power, they could selectively destroy the cells ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • abby olena

    As a freelancer for The Scientist, Abby reports on new developments in life science for the website. She has a PhD from Vanderbilt University and got her start in science journalism as the Chicago Tribune’s AAAS Mass Media Fellow in 2013. Following a stint as an intern for The Scientist, Abby was a postdoc in science communication at Duke University, where she developed and taught courses to help scientists share their research. In addition to her work as a science journalist, she leads science writing and communication workshops and co-produces a conversational podcast. She is based in Alabama.  

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
The Scientist Digest cover September 2026
September 2026

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

A new system that enables researchers to uniquely tag monoclonal antibodies for use in microscopy could help simplify complex imaging studies.

View this Issue
Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Alamar Biosciences logo
Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Bio-Rad
Beyond the Basics: Strategies for Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis

Beyond the Basics: Strategies for Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis

bioxcell
Scientist reviewing cellular and molecular data on a computer in a laboratory.

Building Translation-Ready Biomarkers with Connected Workflows

Danaher Logo

Products

Closeup image of a multi channel pipette dispensing pink liquid into a 96-well plate.

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Integra Logo
Single cells in suspension

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

Corning logo
Abstract image representing cell membranes linked together.

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Biotium
sino biological logo

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays