Molecular Signatures Reveal Delayed Pig Organ Rejection

Genetically modified pigs have led to a breakthrough in xenotransplantation, but it didn’t eliminate all possibilities of organ rejection.

Written byAndrea Lius, PhD
| 3 min read
A blue pig with a red kidney is on the left-hand side of the image. A translucent human torso with black organs (except the left kidney, which is red). Red square outlines frame the kidneys, both in the pig and the human, indicating the interspecies organ transplant. A vertical, grey double-stranded DNA is at the center of the image, indicating the alpha-gal genetic modification in pigs, which has significantly improved xenotransplantation outcomes.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share

About 13 people in the United States die every day waiting for an organ transplant. Yet, the transplant waiting list keeps growing; every eight minutes, another person is added. Xenotransplantation, the transfer of organs between different species, can be a promising solution.

“Xenotransplantation could provide an unlimited and renewable source of organs,” said Valentin Goutaudier, a nephrologist and researcher at the Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR).

Valentin Goutaudier, wearing glasses and a blue tee, poses in front of a white background with a red door frame.

Valentin Goutaudier is a nephrologist and researcher at the Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration. Goutaudier and his colleagues developed a molecular platform to evaluate both human-to-human and pig-to-human organ transplantation outcomes.

Valentin Goutaudier

Over the past few years, the science of xenotransplantation has greatly advanced because scientists managed to prevent hyperacute organ rejection using genetically modified pigs. But Goutaudier and his colleagues recently found that humans still react to pig organs—these responses are just subtler and delayed.

Using molecular approaches such as spatial transcriptomics and imaging, the researchers found signs of inflammation and immune activation in pig-to-human kidney transplant patients, which may be treated using inhibitor drugs. Goutaudier presented these findings at the annual European Society for Organ Transplantation congress on June 30, 2025.

Knockout Pigs Prevent Hyperacute Organ Rejection

Pigs naturally express a sugar called alpha-gal, an antigen to which human antibodies are highly reactive. If not removed, this sugar could cause hyperacute organ rejection. As a result, Goutaudier said, the donated kidney would turn blue, soft, and non-functional, sometimes within seconds.

To overcome this issue, researchers genetically modified pigs so they would lack alpha-gal. In 2021, surgeons successfully transplanted kidneys from alpha-gal knockout pigs to two brain-dead human patients. Transplant surgeon Robert Montgomery at New York University (NYU) led this effort.

Thanks to alpha-gal knockout pigs, hyperacute organ rejection no longer occurs. And while xenotransplantation remains controversial, earlier this year, the US Food and Drug Administration finally approved the first clinical trial for this experimental therapy after decades.

Continue reading below...

Like this story? Sign up for FREE Genetics updates:

Latest science news storiesTopic-tailored resources and eventsCustomized newsletter content
Subscribe

Goutaudier and his colleagues wanted to assess how the transplanted organs fare long term. In xenotransplantation, this translates to weeks and months after the surgery. These follow-up studies may also help clinicians predict issues that could arise and find ways to prevent or treat them.

“We thought that it’s quite impossible that with just some genetic modification, they did not observe any sign of rejection,” Goutaudier said.

Molecular Analyses Could Reveal Subtle, Delayed Signs of Organ Rejection

Goutaudier and his colleagues have long collaborated with Montgomery to study the signs of organ rejection in human-to-human (allo-) transplantation. To do this, they’ve developed a molecular phenotyping workflow that consists of imaging along with transcriptomics analyses, both bulk and spatial. The latter is performed at the tissue, cellular, and subcellular levels. Alexandre Loupy, a nephrologist at PITOR, leads this work.

“We use our tools to see if there is rejection, then find the mechanism in order to better personalize the treatment of the patients,” Goutaudier said.

So far, Goutaudier and his colleagues have collaborated with surgeons at NYU and the University of Maryland to study three brain-dead and two living xenotransplantation patients; more are ongoing and planned. They found a strong activation of the complement system, a part of the innate immune response, in the weeks and months after xenotransplantation. For this reason, complement inhibitor drugs will likely be beneficial, Goutaudier said.

Another finding, which the researchers had partially reported, was the visible signs of inflammation in the patients’ glomeruli, the networks of small blood vessels that are responsible for filtering waste from the blood.1 They also found significant enrichment of transcripts that indicate immune activation. These observations support the researchers’ hypothesis that although hyperacute rejection no longer occurs, patients’ immune cells still react to xenotransplanted organs. “We don’t know why, but we see these patterns in patients,” Goutaudier said. “The pathways may be different, so precision medicine can be a powerful tool.”

Goutaudier added that although there’s no clear evidence that adding more genetic manipulations to pigs would improve xenotransplantation outcomes, researchers shouldn’t necessarily halt future efforts to look for further genetic modifications that could benefit patients.

“We have to find the right balance for the different approaches,” he said. “We need all these studies because nobody has the answer yet.”

  1. Loupy A, Goutaudier V, Giarraputo A, et al. Immune response after pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation: a multimodal phenotyping study. Lancet. 2023;402(10408):1158-1169.

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • Image of Andrea Lius.

    Andrea Lius is an intern at The Scientist. She earned her PhD in pharmacology from the University of Washington. Besides science, she also enjoys writing short-form creative nonfiction.

    View Full Profile
Share
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
February 2026

A Stubborn Gene, a Failed Experiment, and a New Path

When experiments refuse to cooperate, you try again and again. For Rafael Najmanovich, the setbacks ultimately pushed him in a new direction.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Pioneers Life Sciences Innovation with High-Quality Bioreagents on Inside Business Today with Bill and Guiliana Rancic

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Expands Research Reagent Portfolio to Support Global Nipah Virus Vaccine and Diagnostic Development

Beckman Coulter

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Partners with Automata to Accelerate AI-Ready Laboratory Automation

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies