Senate Hears NIH Funding Woes

Top brass at the US science agency aired monetary grievances before a Senate committee last week.

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

WIKIMEDIA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYThe already slim budget for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is being further sapped by the government-wide sequester to the point that a whole generation of US scientists is at risk, according to agency director Francis Collins. After highlighting “exciting new initiatives” at the NIH and praising President Barack Obama’s $31.3 billion 2014 budget request for the agency, Collins bemoaned the belt tightening that the sequestration—a 10-year, across the board cut to discretionary funding mandated by the Budget Control Act—has set in motion.

“If the Budget Control Act-imposed caps on discretionary programs continue, and NIH funding is reduced proportionally over the next 10 years, funding will decline by about $19 billion,” Collins told the US Senate’s Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education last Wednesday (May 15). “The consequences will be harmful to scientific progress and to American leadership in science.”

The sequestration would cut 5 percent of the NIH’s appropriation, essentially eliminating the 1.5 percent provided by Obama’s 2014 budget and leaving the agency $1.6 billion short of its 2013 budget. And if the sequester remains in place for a decade, NIH funding would suffer the $19 billion loss Collins mentioned in his plea to the Subcommittee.

“At a time when global competition in the life ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Bob Grant

    From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.
Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital
Concept illustration of acoustic waves and ripples.

Comparing Analytical Solutions for High-Throughput Drug Discovery

sciex

Products

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo
Singleron Avatar

Singleron Biotechnologies and Hamilton Bonaduz AG Announce the Launch of Tensor to Advance Single Cell Sequencing Automation

Zymo Research Logo

Zymo Research Launches Research Grant to Empower Mapping the RNome