ASAPbio has developed resources for preprint servers, institutions, scientists, and journalists to promote the responsible reporting of research in the media.

Researchers propose that an infusion of memory T cells from people who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infections could treat severe disease.

The open access publication will use AI to identify the most pressing manuscripts in need of peer review.

Experts identify childcare, which tends to fall to women, as one likely cause for the relative decrease in women’s scientific productivity compared with men’s.

Fast science—with all its warts—is making unprecedented progress in the fight against COVID-19.

The results, while preliminary, suggest that survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be susceptible to reinfection within weeks or months.

Preprints from the first round of seroprevalence studies indicate that many more people have been infected with the virus than previously reported. Some of these studies also have serious design flaws.

Coronavirus experts are swamped with reading submissions, which they’re working through as quickly as possible.

This is the first time sugars have been found connected to RNA molecules, suggesting a new role for RNA.

The cofounder of bioRxiv, Richard Sever, discusses why there’s a need for the preprint server medRxiv that launched today.

Researchers from 17 labs report low efficacy rates for the popular technique.

Papers sent to PLOS journals will be automatically uploaded to the preprint server before acceptance.

In 2017, scientists, regulators, and publishers clashed in a series of lawsuits, boycotts, mass resignations, and more.

Two manuscripts published without methods point to the importance of community policing on preprint archives.

We suggest a centralized facility for submitting to journals—one that would benefit scientists and not only publishers.

An NIH survey of 351 individuals in the research community has shown that many are supportive of interim research products like preprints.

In an agency first, the National Institutes of Health provides guidance on citing certain non-peer-reviewed publications in agency proposals and reports.

Major research funding agencies lend their support to an ASAPbio-led effort to streamline the banking of non–peer-reviewed manuscripts in the life sciences.

As ASAPbio and individual life scientists respond to FASEB’s statement against the inclusion of preprints in NIH grant applications, more than 600 researchers sign a petition in support of citing these non peer-reviewed works in such proposals.