The COVID-19 Pandemic Abruptly Altered the Infant Microbiome

Microbial diversity in the infant gut shrank suddenly during the first lockdown, but the lasting health effects are less clear.

Written byKamal Nahas, PhD
| 4 min read
A baby and a caregiver with a face mask.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00
Share

Bacteria rapidly colonize the gut of a newborn immediately following birth, creating the microbiome.1 Social and environmental factors influence the makeup of the microbiome after birth. In fact, babies born by Caesarian section initially develop microbiomes that are distinct from their parent’s when compared to infants delivered naturally who pick up bacteria as they pass through the vaginal canal.2 The early days of the COVID-19 pandemic required social distancing measures and heightened hygiene practices, but it wasn’t clear how this might affect the infant microbiome. Now, communicated in Scientific Reports, researchers report that infant microbiome diversity plummeted when the pandemic spiked.3

Sarah Vogel, a developmental psychologist at Boston University, was working at New York University when SARS-CoV-2 began to spread across the globe. At the time, Vogel and her colleagues were carrying out a large study exploring how factors like socioeconomic status and caregiver wellbeing affect early development in infants. When lockdown restrictions came into effect, the laboratory closed, and the project came to an abrupt halt, except for one small project on the microbiome. The researchers initially planned to explore how the microbiome influences neurocognitive development. However, they anticipated that the lockdown would alter infants’ exposure to bacteria, so they quickly pivoted to studying whether the pandemic slashed gut microbiome diversity.

Unable to go into the laboratory, the team needed to adapt their working protocol. “You can picture me at home throughout 2020 on the phone with parents—texting them, calling them, emailing them—trying to get them to participate in this part of the study,” Vogel said. Gut bacteria are normally sampled from stool, so Vogel and her team mailed stool collection kits to participating families. They then sent the unsightly packages off for sequencing to determine the microbiome’s makeup from the bacterial RNA in the samples.

See also “When Microbes Meet the Immune System

The team hypothesized that social distancing measures, such as daycare closures, fewer outdoor activities, and limited social interactions might limit the bacteria infants contact and reduce their microbial milieu. Indeed, Vogel found that infant microbiome diversity declined as soon as the pandemic began. This was true for the number of bacterial species within an individual, but also for bacterial diversity between infants, whose microbiomes became similar after the pandemic. “This is a fairly moderately sized effect,” Vogel noted. “But to what extent these differences translate to observable differences in health remains a little bit unclear.”

Researchers have previously tried to study how microbiome diversity affects child health, but their work yielded mixed results. Some researchers demonstrated that a drop in gut diversity predisposed children to a slew of unwanted immune reactions like asthma and food allergy, while others found that there isn’t enough evidence to make this connection.4–6 In this study, Vogel said, “None of the parents that I spoke to gave any indication that their child was experiencing any kind of health concerns out of the normal.”

Edoardo Pasolli, a bioinformatician at the University of Naples Federico II who was not involved in the study said, “The choice of the infant microbiome was a good one because we know that changes during the first weeks, months, and years of life can be affected by multiple factors, much more than the adult microbiome that is more stable.” Given the malleability of the infant microbiome, it’s possible that gut diversity returned to prepandemic levels once New York relaxed lockdown restrictions. However, the researchers were unable to run follow-up experiments on the infants. “There may be more of a delay on the maturation of the microbiome,” Pasolli speculated.

Continue reading below...

Like this story? Sign up for FREE Immunology updates:

Latest science news storiesTopic-tailored resources and eventsCustomized newsletter content
Subscribe

With only 54 infants under the age of one, Vogel lacked the statistical power to study changes in most individual bacterial lineages. However, she observed a decline for the Pasteurellaceae family, including the genus Haemophilus, a phenomenon linked to scrupulous cleaning practices in other studies.7

The team accounted for many variables that might affect microbiome diversity, like age and demographic background, Pasolli noted. They also controlled for breastfeeding, which Vogel said has one of the largest effects on microbiome diversity.8 However, it’s unclear whether these findings are generalizable since all of the participants lived in New York City, which Vogel said faced tougher restrictions than other places. “We were hit much harder and much earlier,” she explained. It’s possible that infant gut microbiomes elsewhere may not have changed as much.

See also “The Infant Gut Microbiome and Probiotics that Work

If she were to repeat the study, Vogel said that she would aim to recruit a more geographically diverse cohort of participants to study the microbiome in different environments. She would also like to explore how infant microbiomes differ between households that are disproportionately affected by lockdowns, such as ones containing essential workers versus those who work entirely from home.

“We know that lifestyle has a big impact on the human microbiome,” Pasolli said. He suggested that future studies should track changes in infant microbiomes over time to see whether they recover their diversity in the wake of a pandemic.

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • Kamal Nahas

    Kamal is a freelance science journalist based in the UK with a PhD in virology from the University of Cambridge. He enjoys writing about the quirky side of biology, like the remarkable extent to which we depend on our gut bacteria, as well as technological breakthroughs, including how artificial intelligence can be leveraged to design proteins. His work has also appeared in Live Science, Nature, New Scientist, Science, Scientific American, and other places. Find him at www.kamalnahas.com or on X @KLNahas.

    View Full Profile
Share
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
Illustration of a developing fetus surrounded by a clear fluid with a subtle yellow tinge, representing amniotic fluid.
January 2026, Issue 1

What Is the Amniotic Fluid Composed of?

The liquid world of fetal development provides a rich source of nutrition and protection tailored to meet the needs of the growing fetus.

View this Issue
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Unchained Labs
Graphic of three DNA helices in various colors

An Automated DNA-to-Data Framework for Production-Scale Sequencing

illumina

Products

nuclera logo

Nuclera eProtein Discovery System installed at leading Universities in Taiwan

Brandtech Logo

BRANDTECH Scientific Introduces the Transferpette® pro Micropipette: A New Twist on Comfort and Control

Biotium Logo

Biotium Launches GlycoLiner™ Cell Surface Glycoprotein Labeling Kits for Rapid and Selective Cell Surface Imaging

Colorful abstract spiral dot pattern on a black background

Thermo Scientific X and S Series General Purpose Centrifuges

Thermo Fisher Logo