The Right to Not Know

Patients should be able to decline learning about incidental genetic findings when undergoing whole-genome screens, according to new expert recommendations.

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTHPatients who have their genomes sequenced should be able to decide which results they’d like to know, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) announced yesterday (April 1). The organization’s new policy in effect reverses its controversial position on “incidental” genetic findings, announced last year, which many criticized. As the cost of genomic testing plunges, more tests are being done, and the likelihood that an unpleasant genetic surprise could be uncovered grows, posing a dilemma for clinicians.

The ACMG’s initial policy recommended that doctors tell patients about risks for genetic diseases even if those results were unrelated to why the test was ordered in the first place. In December, a federally appointed bioethics panel recommended patients should decide if they want to be alerted to unexpected genetic results.

ACMG now recommends that patients consult with their doctors to decide whether they want the tests done at all. “This update to our recommendations moves the opt-out discussion to the point where the sample is sent rather than at the time when results are received by the ordering clinician, as was originally recommended,” ACMG President Gail Herman said in a statement.

Some doctors oppose the new policy, however. “I worry that allowing this opt out will disproportionately impact the disenfranchised. It will become too easy for a lazy doctor just to say ‘OK, we’ll skip [this important testing],’” Robert Green of Harvard Medical School, who helped write the original ACMG recommendations, told Scientific American.

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Rina Shaikh-Lesko

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Characterizing Immune Memory to COVID-19 Vaccination

Characterizing Immune Memory to COVID-19 Vaccination

10X Genomics
Pairing Protein Engineering and Cellular Assays

Pairing Protein Engineering and Cellular Assays

Lonza
Faster Fluid Measurements for Formulation Development

Meet Honeybun and Breeze Through Viscometry in Formulation Development

Unchained Labs
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo

Products

Metrion Biosciences Logo

Metrion Biosciences launches NaV1.9 high-throughput screening assay to strengthen screening portfolio and advance research on new medicines for pain

Biotium Logo

Biotium Unveils New Assay Kit with Exceptional RNase Detection Sensitivity

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo