The Right to Not Know

Patients should be able to decline learning about incidental genetic findings when undergoing whole-genome screens, according to new expert recommendations.

Written byRina Shaikh-Lesko
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTHPatients who have their genomes sequenced should be able to decide which results they’d like to know, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) announced yesterday (April 1). The organization’s new policy in effect reverses its controversial position on “incidental” genetic findings, announced last year, which many criticized. As the cost of genomic testing plunges, more tests are being done, and the likelihood that an unpleasant genetic surprise could be uncovered grows, posing a dilemma for clinicians.

The ACMG’s initial policy recommended that doctors tell patients about risks for genetic diseases even if those results were unrelated to why the test was ordered in the first place. In December, a federally appointed bioethics panel recommended patients should decide if they want to be alerted to unexpected genetic results.

ACMG now recommends that patients consult with their doctors to decide whether they want the tests done at all. “This update to our recommendations moves the opt-out discussion to the point where the sample is sent rather than at the time when results are received by the ordering clinician, as was originally recommended,” ACMG President Gail Herman said in a statement.

Some doctors oppose the new policy, however. “I worry that allowing this opt out will disproportionately impact the disenfranchised. It will become too easy for a lazy doctor just to say ‘OK, we’ll skip [this important testing],’” Robert Green of Harvard Medical School, who helped write the original ACMG recommendations, told Scientific American.

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

Share
December digest cover image of a wooden sculpture comprised of multiple wooden neurons that form a seahorse.
December 2025, Issue 1

Wooden Neurons: An Artistic Vision of the Brain

A neurobiologist, who loves the morphology of cells, turns these shapes into works of art made from wood.

View this Issue
Stacks of cell culture dishes, plates, and flasks with pink cell culture medium on a white background.

Driving Innovation with Cell Culture Essentials

Merck
Stacks of cell culture dishes, plates, and flasks with pink cell culture medium on a white background.

Driving Innovation with Cell Culture Essentials

MilliporeSigma purple logo
Human iPSC-derived Models for Brain Disease Research

Human iPSC-derived Models for Neurodegenerative Disease Research

Fujifilm
Abstract wireframe sphere with colorful dots and connecting lines representing the complex cellular and molecular interactions within the tumor microenvironment.

Exploring the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment 

Cellecta logo

Products

brandtech logo

BRANDTECH® Scientific Announces Strategic Partnership with Copia Scientific to Strengthen Sales and Service of the BRAND® Liquid Handling Station (LHS) 

Top Innovations 2026 Contest Image

Enter Our 2026 Top Innovations Contest

Biotium Logo

Biotium Expands Tyramide Signal Amplification Portfolio with Brighter and More Stable Dyes for Enhanced Spatial Imaging

Labvantage Logo

LabVantage Solutions Awarded $22.3 Million U.S Customs and Border Protection Contract to Deliver Next-Generation Forensic LIMS