Skip to main content

Following the Funding

Researchers use network theory to estimate the importance of relationships among researchers and institutions in attracting grant money.

Written byJef Akst
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00

A network of collaborations among universities and industrial entities funded by the United Kingdom’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council between 1985 and 2013.COURTESY OF ATHEN MACertain networks of institutional collaborations are more successful in securing grants than others, according to a new study of 43,000 U.K. government-funded research projects. The analysis was published in PNAS last week (October 26). The “rich club,” as Phys.org called it, attracted more resources, but also produced “research with notable breadth and depth.” In other words, government funding is unequally distributed among research institutions, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing “as far as the quality and variety of research are concerned,” Phys.org reported.

“This [successful network] is likely to have arisen due to [the institutions’] ability to develop a broad range of expertise and extend partnerships with specialist entities,” the authors wrote in their paper. “In addition to that, these universities formed the very center of a rich core through their strong reliance.” Institutions that formed collaborations of the “rich club” seemed to benefit from increased funding.

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • Jef (an unusual nickname for Jennifer) got her master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses. After four years of diving off the Gulf Coast of Tampa and performing behavioral experiments at the Tennessee Aquarium in Chattanooga, she left research to pursue a career in science writing. As The Scientist's managing editor, Jef edited features and oversaw the production of the TS Digest and quarterly print magazine. In 2022, her feature on uterus transplantation earned first place in the trade category of the Awards for Excellence in Health Care Journalism. She is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

cytiva logo
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Scientist holding a clear 384-well PCR microplate in a laboratory

What Dictates PCR Success Before Amplification Begins?

Integra Logo
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches European Newsletter Campaign with Exclusive Welcome Gifts

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo