Skip to main content

Gut bugs affect mating

Differences in diet alter the composition of microbiota in Drosophila, which appears to in turn influence mate preferences -- and drive speciation

Written byJef Akst
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Drosophila seem to prefer to mate with other Drosophila raised on the same diet as a result of the bacteria that live in their guts, according to a study published this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Image: Wikimedia commons,
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
These apparent mate preferences, which arose after just one generation, suggest that an organism's microbiota can facilitate rapid evolution and speciation."It's an interesting paper," said linkurl:Patty Gowaty;https://www.eeb.ucla.edu/indivfaculty.php?FacultyKey=8418 of the University of California, Los Angeles, who did not participate in the study. "The thought that these gut bacteria could be associated with the reproductive outcomes for individuals is fascinating.""There's a lot of emerging research these days about the physiological effects of microbiota, and changes in microbiota in response to environmental conditions," added evolutionary geneticist linkurl:Paul Hohenlohe;https://people.oregonstate.edu/%7Ehohenlop/ of Oregon State University, who was also not involved in the research. "This study ties that into mating preference, too."Twenty years ago, Diane Dodd of Yale University raised Drosophila melanogaster on different media for more than 25 generations and found that those raised on starch media were more likely to mate with other starch-raised flies, while those raised on maltose were more likely to mate with maltose-raised flies."Nobody understood the mechanism for this, but they understood it was important because mating preference is an early stage of sexual isolation and speciation," said microbiologist linkurl:Eugene Rosenberg,;https://www.tau.ac.il/lifesci/departments/biotech/members/rosenberg/rosenberg.html a professor emeritus at Tel Aviv University in Israel and coauthor of the PNAS paper. "And nothing is more fundamental to evolution than the origin of species."To investigate why these apparent mating preferences arise between flies raised on different diets, Rosenberg and his colleagues first repeated Dodd's experiment using molasses and starch media. Placing together two males and two females, one from each group, the researchers confirmed Dodd's finding that flies tended to mate with other flies raised on similar diets, and found that this nonrandom mating occurred after as little as one generation on the different medium types. The team then treated the flies with antibiotics to rid them of the microorganisms that reside in their guts. Immediately, the flies lost their apparent mating preferences, randomly choosing between molasses-raised flies and starch-raised flies. The results suggested that something in the gut microbiota was driving Drosophila mate preference.It is not clear whether or not these data represent actual mating preferences, however, Gowaty said. "That's one [possibility], but it's not the only one," she said. "When there's more than one male and one female, there's also the possibility of within-sex interactions" that affect which flies mate, such as male-male competition. To determine which bacteria might be driving the nonrandom mating among the flies, the team sampled the microbiota of flies raised on each type of media. One striking difference between the groups was the proportion of a bacterium called Lactobacillus plantarum. While this bacterium made up 26 percent of the microbiota of starch-raised flies, molasses-raised flies contained only 3 percent L. plantarum. When the researchers infected sterile (antibiotic-treated) flies with the bacteria, the mating preferences returned, indicating L. plantarum was indeed influencing the flies' mating patterns.How exactly the bacterium has this effect is uncertain, however, Rosenberg told The Scientist. The team detected significant differences in the composition of the flies' sex pheromones, known as cuticular hydrocarbons, but "this is just a hint that [microbiota] may be working through these sex hormones," he said. "Much more work has to be done to understand the mechanism" by which these bacteria are influencing the flies' sexual behavior.Another important unanswered question that remains is how these mating outcomes affect individual fitness, Gowaty said. Rosenberg and his coauthors suggest that their results fit with a theory of evolution called the hologenome theory, where the unit of natural selection is the "holobiont" -- the organism plus all of its microorganisms, as opposed to just the individual itself. "In order to get variation, which is the raw material for evolution, you can change either the microorganisms or the host," he explained. And because microorganisms can change in response to the environment much more rapidly than the host, evolution of the holobiont may be "an important, driving force, especially for rapid evolution," Rosenberg said. G. Sharon, et al., "Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster," PNAS, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1009906107, 2010.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Gut sex;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/57587/
[August 2010]*linkurl:Spontaneous speciation?;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55825/
[15th July 2009]*linkurl:Red fish, blue fish, speciation?;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55065/
[ 2nd October 2008]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • Jef (an unusual nickname for Jennifer) got her master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses. After four years of diving off the Gulf Coast of Tampa and performing behavioral experiments at the Tennessee Aquarium in Chattanooga, she left research to pursue a career in science writing. As The Scientist's managing editor, Jef edited features and oversaw the production of the TS Digest and quarterly print magazine. In 2022, her feature on uterus transplantation earned first place in the trade category of the Awards for Excellence in Health Care Journalism. She is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi
Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mission bio

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo
Conceptual image of ice and frost.

The VAULT100 PRO: Inside the most advanced Stirling Ultracold ULT freezer ever built.

Stirling Ultracold logo