iPSCs and Cancer Risk

Reprogramming adult human cells into stem cells in vitro does not generate harmful mutations, scientists report.

Written byCatherine Offord
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

Human embryonic stem cellsWIKIMEDIA, NISSIM BENVENISTYAlthough induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been approved in clinical trials for a handful of diseases, some have expressed concern that patients who receive transplants of iPSC-derived cells might have an increased risk of cancer. But the results of a study published last week (February 19) in Nature Communications suggest that there’s little to make these cells more likely than normal cells to develop into tumors.

“One of the greatest concerns with iPS cells—and this isn’t entirely based in science—is that they’re going to acquire mutations and when we put them into people, the cells are going to go awry and in the worst cases, turn into cancer,” study coauthor Jeanne Loring told STAT News. “But when we looked for mutations known to be associated with cancer, we just didn’t find them.”

To assess the risk of harmful mutations arising from cell reprogramming, the researchers generated nine iPSC lines from human fibroblasts using three different reprogrammers: retroviral vectors, non-integrating Sendai virus, and synthetic messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Then they sequenced the cells’ genomes to identify genetic differences such as DNA deletions, insertions, and single-nucleotide variants.

The team found that although the iPSCs ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • After undergraduate research with spiders at the University of Oxford and graduate research with ants at Princeton University, Catherine left arthropods and academia to become a science journalist. She has worked in various guises at The Scientist since 2016. As Senior Editor, she wrote articles for the online and print publications, and edited the magazine’s Notebook, Careers, and Bio Business sections. She reports on subjects ranging from cellular and molecular biology to research misconduct and science policy. Find more of her work at her website.

    View Full Profile
Share
February 2026

A Stubborn Gene, a Failed Experiment, and a New Path

When experiments refuse to cooperate, you try again and again. For Rafael Najmanovich, the setbacks ultimately pushed him in a new direction.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Pioneers Life Sciences Innovation with High-Quality Bioreagents on Inside Business Today with Bill and Guiliana Rancic

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Expands Research Reagent Portfolio to Support Global Nipah Virus Vaccine and Diagnostic Development

Beckman Coulter

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Partners with Automata to Accelerate AI-Ready Laboratory Automation

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies