Skip to main content

iPSCs and Cancer Risk

Reprogramming adult human cells into stem cells in vitro does not generate harmful mutations, scientists report.

Written byCatherine Offord
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00

Human embryonic stem cellsWIKIMEDIA, NISSIM BENVENISTYAlthough induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been approved in clinical trials for a handful of diseases, some have expressed concern that patients who receive transplants of iPSC-derived cells might have an increased risk of cancer. But the results of a study published last week (February 19) in Nature Communications suggest that there’s little to make these cells more likely than normal cells to develop into tumors.

“One of the greatest concerns with iPS cells—and this isn’t entirely based in science—is that they’re going to acquire mutations and when we put them into people, the cells are going to go awry and in the worst cases, turn into cancer,” study coauthor Jeanne Loring told STAT News. “But when we looked for mutations known to be associated with cancer, we just didn’t find them.”

To assess the risk of harmful mutations arising from cell reprogramming, the researchers generated nine iPSC lines from human fibroblasts using three different reprogrammers: retroviral vectors, non-integrating Sendai virus, and synthetic messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Then they sequenced the cells’ genomes to identify genetic differences such as DNA deletions, insertions, and single-nucleotide variants.

The team found that although the iPSCs ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • After undergraduate research with spiders at the University of Oxford and graduate research with ants at Princeton University, Catherine left arthropods and academia to become a science journalist. She has worked in various guises at The Scientist since 2016. As Senior Editor, she wrote articles for the online and print publications, and edited the magazine’s Notebook, Careers, and Bio Business sections. She reports on subjects ranging from cellular and molecular biology to research misconduct and science policy. Find more of her work at her website.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

Improving rAAV Production for Viral Vector Manufacturing

cytiva logo
Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Advancing Respiratory Immunity Through Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Research

Miltenyi
Scientist holding a clear 384-well PCR microplate in a laboratory

What Dictates PCR Success Before Amplification Begins?

Integra Logo
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches European Newsletter Campaign with Exclusive Welcome Gifts

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo