iPSCs and Cancer Risk

Reprogramming adult human cells into stem cells in vitro does not generate harmful mutations, scientists report.

Written byCatherine Offord
| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

Human embryonic stem cellsWIKIMEDIA, NISSIM BENVENISTYAlthough induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been approved in clinical trials for a handful of diseases, some have expressed concern that patients who receive transplants of iPSC-derived cells might have an increased risk of cancer. But the results of a study published last week (February 19) in Nature Communications suggest that there’s little to make these cells more likely than normal cells to develop into tumors.

“One of the greatest concerns with iPS cells—and this isn’t entirely based in science—is that they’re going to acquire mutations and when we put them into people, the cells are going to go awry and in the worst cases, turn into cancer,” study coauthor Jeanne Loring told STAT News. “But when we looked for mutations known to be associated with cancer, we just didn’t find them.”

To assess the risk of harmful mutations arising from cell reprogramming, the researchers generated nine iPSC lines from human fibroblasts using three different reprogrammers: retroviral vectors, non-integrating Sendai virus, and synthetic messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Then they sequenced the cells’ genomes to identify genetic differences such as DNA deletions, insertions, and single-nucleotide variants.

The team found that although the iPSCs ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • After undergraduate research with spiders at the University of Oxford and graduate research with ants at Princeton University, Catherine left arthropods and academia to become a science journalist. She has worked in various guises at The Scientist since 2016. As Senior Editor, she wrote articles for the online and print publications, and edited the magazine’s Notebook, Careers, and Bio Business sections. She reports on subjects ranging from cellular and molecular biology to research misconduct and science policy. Find more of her work at her website.

    View Full Profile
Share
Illustration of a developing fetus surrounded by a clear fluid with a subtle yellow tinge, representing amniotic fluid.
January 2026, Issue 1

What Is the Amniotic Fluid Composed of?

The liquid world of fetal development provides a rich source of nutrition and protection tailored to meet the needs of the growing fetus.

View this Issue
Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Unchained Labs
Graphic of three DNA helices in various colors

An Automated DNA-to-Data Framework for Production-Scale Sequencing

illumina
Exploring Cellular Organization with Spatial Proteomics

Exploring Cellular Organization with Spatial Proteomics

Abstract illustration of spheres with multiple layers, representing endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm derived organoids

Organoid Origins and How to Grow Them

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

Brandtech Logo

BRANDTECH Scientific Introduces the Transferpette® pro Micropipette: A New Twist on Comfort and Control

Biotium Logo

Biotium Launches GlycoLiner™ Cell Surface Glycoprotein Labeling Kits for Rapid and Selective Cell Surface Imaging

Colorful abstract spiral dot pattern on a black background

Thermo Scientific X and S Series General Purpose Centrifuges

Thermo Fisher Logo
Abstract background with red and blue laser lights

VANTAstar Flexible microplate reader with simplified workflows

BMG LABTECH