Metabolic theory spat heats up

Proponents of biological "theory of everything" call for retraction of a critical paper

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
The authors of a controversial theory about the scaling of metabolic rate are demanding the retraction of a paper that criticized their work in a letter published in the November 1 issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology.The theory, proposed by Geoffrey West and collaborators a decade ago, explains how basal metabolic rate and other physiological features vary with body size. In 2005, West, currently at the Santa Fe Institute, published an invited review in JEB detailing recent advances in the field. In response, José Guilherme Chaui-Berlinck of the Universidade de São Paulo last year published a paper in the journal questioning both the empirical support for the model and its mathematical derivation.But according to West and his colleagues, Chaui-Berlinck's conclusion was based on a mistranscription of one of their equations and an error in his calculus. "He made a pretty fundamental mistake, and we were surprised it got through the reviewing process," Brian Enquist of the University of Arizona, the corresponding author of the JEB letter, told The Scientist.Enquist also blamed the editorial process, claiming that none of his collaborators, who are intimately familiar with their scaling model, reviewed the paper. Also, he said, "If someone accuses an author of basic mathematical mistakes, wouldn't you ask the authors to respond to or review the paper?" JEB Editor-in-Chief Hans Hoppeler disputed this notion. "There is a lot of direct criticism that does not go to the author of the original paper. That is up to the editors to decide," he said. He added that Chaui-Berlinck's paper was thoroughly reviewed before publication.Chaui-Berlinck conceded in his reply, also published in the November 1 issue, that he had made some mistakes, but told The Scientist, "The principal finding of my paper is still correct."Outside researchers are still unsure what this latest dispute means for the field. In an Email, ecologist Helene Müller-Landau at the University of Minnesota wrote, "I suspect that West, Enquist et al. will continue repeating their central arguments and others will continue repeating the same central critiques, for years to come, until the weight of evidence finally leads one or the other to win out."Hoppeler said the journal has no plans to retract the original paper, and has never retracted a paper under his tenure, and he would only consider doing so if it contained fraudulent data. He said this case is a difference of opinion, which is why the journal published the unedited correspondence of both authors. "That fulfills the criteria for scientific publishing," he said, "and if anybody is unable to make a judgment now he can consult a biologist or statistician."Brendan Borrell mail@the-scientist.comLinks within this article:B. Grant, "The powers that might be," The Scientist, March 1, 2007. http://www.the-scientist.com/2007/3/1/42/1/V.M. Savage et al., "Comment on 'A critical understanding of the fractal model of metabolic scaling,'" J Exp Biol, 210: 3873-3874, 2007. http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/17951428G.B. West et al., "A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology," Science, 276,122 -126, 1997. http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/9082983 S. Bunk, "Do energy transport systems shape organisms?" The Scientist, December 7, 1998. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/18316/G.B. West and J.H. Brown, "The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization," J. Exp. Biol. 208: 1575-1592, 2005. http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/15855389M.L. Phillips, "Study challenges metabolic scaling law," The Scientist, January 26, 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23012/J.G. Chaui-Berlinck, "A critical understanding of the fractal model of metabolic scaling," J. Exp. Biol. 209,3045 -3054, 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/16888053
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Brendan Borrell

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
Image of small blue creatures called Nergals. Some have hearts above their heads, which signify friendship. There is one Nergal who is sneezing and losing health, which is denoted by minus one signs floating around it.
June 2025, Issue 1

Nergal Networks: Where Friendship Meets Infection

A citizen science game explores how social choices and networks can influence how an illness moves through a population.

View this Issue
Unraveling Complex Biology with Advanced Multiomics Technology

Unraveling Complex Biology with Five-Dimensional Multiomics

Element Bioscience Logo
Resurrecting Plant Defense Mechanisms to Avoid Crop Pathogens

Resurrecting Plant Defense Mechanisms to Avoid Crop Pathogens

Twist Bio 
The Scientist Placeholder Image

Seeing and Sorting with Confidence

BD
The Scientist Placeholder Image

Streamlining Microbial Quality Control Testing

MicroQuant™ by ATCC logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Agilent Unveils the Next Generation in LC-Mass Detection: The InfinityLab Pro iQ Series

parse-biosciences-logo

Pioneering Cancer Plasticity Atlas will help Predict Response to Cancer Therapies

waters-logo

How Alderley Analytical are Delivering eXtreme Robustness in Bioanalysis