New “Kill Test” Could Help Screen Better Antibiotics

A new single cell-based screening tool evaluates how well antibiotics kill bacteria and may help researchers determine which drugs perform best in patients.

Written byAndrea Lius, PhD
| 2 min read
Cartoon illustration of dead, rod-shaped bacteria, signifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis successfully defeated by antibiotics.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious public health problem, but it is not the only reason why some antibiotics don’t work. Some bacteria, such as tuberculosis-causing Mycobacterium tuberculosis, can withstand antibiotic treatment without developing resistance in a phenomenon called antibiotic tolerance. When antibiotics just block bacterial growth, the cells can lay low for months, dormant but alive.

Existing tests for how well antibiotics work against infections typically focus on the evaluating the drugs’ ability to inhibit bacterial growth, not kill them. This can lead to long treatment courses and poor outcomes.

To identify antibiotics that will kill bacteria outright, Lucas Boeck, a biomedical researcher at the University of Basel, and his colleagues recently developed a workflow called antimicrobial single-cell testing (ASCT).1 This test quantifies how well antibiotics kill bacteria at single-cell resolution. The method, published in Nature Microbiology, can help predict how well human patients will respond to specific antibiotic treatments.

Lucas Boeck, wearing a dark-colored tee and glasses, poses in front of a light-colored, blurred background.

Lucas Boeck, a biomedical researcher at the University of Basel, investigates pathogenic microorganisms' response to drug treatment.

Lucas Boeck

“The better bacteria tolerate an antibiotic, the lower the chances of therapeutic success are for the patients,” said Boeck in a statement.

To demonstrate how ASCT works, Boeck’s team placed Mycobacterium abscessus in a 1,536-well plate. This lung infection-causing pathogen is related to M. tuberculosis, but it poses less of a biosafety hazard to the researchers.

The team stained M. abscessus with a dye that signals viability and treated them with eight antibiotic drugs for three days. To monitor killing, they took images every two to four hours for three days. The researchers tracked the “time-kill kinetics” for each cell, a metric which indicates how quickly each drug kills the bacteria. Next, the team tested if ASCT is more predictive of antibiotic treatment outcomes for M. tuberculosis infections in living organisms than in a standard growth inhibition assay. They first used ASCT to evaluate how well the 65 antibiotic combinations killed two avirulent strains of M. tuberculosis. Then, they leveraged data from existing mouse and human studies and categorized antibiotic drug combinations depending on how well they mitigate M. tuberculosis infections in mice and humans relative to the standard-of-care regimen.2-5 The researchers found that ASCT could distinguish between drugs that were “similar to” standard-of-care and their “better than” counterparts, but the growth inhibition assay could not.

To better understand how different strains of mycobacteria tolerate antibiotic treatment, Boeck’s team studied clinical isolates of M. abscessus from 405 patients. The researchers investigated how well M. abscessus tolerated eight commonly used antibiotics for up to 72 hours, tracking more than 100 million individual cells in total. They discovered that the isolates’ responses to antibiotics were different from one another, indicating that bacterial strain differences influence antibiotic tolerance.

Boeck hopes that ASCT can one day help personalize drug regimens to each patient and the pathogen they are fighting.

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • Image of Andrea Lius.

    Andrea Lius is an intern at The Scientist. She earned her PhD in pharmacology from the University of Washington. Besides science, she also enjoys writing short-form creative nonfiction.

    View Full Profile
Share
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
Illustration of a developing fetus surrounded by a clear fluid with a subtle yellow tinge, representing amniotic fluid.
January 2026, Issue 1

What Is the Amniotic Fluid Composed of?

The liquid world of fetal development provides a rich source of nutrition and protection tailored to meet the needs of the growing fetus.

View this Issue
Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Unchained Labs
Graphic of three DNA helices in various colors

An Automated DNA-to-Data Framework for Production-Scale Sequencing

illumina
Exploring Cellular Organization with Spatial Proteomics

Exploring Cellular Organization with Spatial Proteomics

Abstract illustration of spheres with multiple layers, representing endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm derived organoids

Organoid Origins and How to Grow Them

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

nuclera logo

Nuclera eProtein Discovery System installed at leading Universities in Taiwan

Brandtech Logo

BRANDTECH Scientific Introduces the Transferpette® pro Micropipette: A New Twist on Comfort and Control

Biotium Logo

Biotium Launches GlycoLiner™ Cell Surface Glycoprotein Labeling Kits for Rapid and Selective Cell Surface Imaging

Colorful abstract spiral dot pattern on a black background

Thermo Scientific X and S Series General Purpose Centrifuges

Thermo Fisher Logo