A group of eleven scientific advisers charged with helping the UK set up a public debate on the future of GM foods has launched a scathing attack on the government's motives.

It warns the entire exercise is in danger of being seen as a huge public relations exercise unless ministers make radical changes to the funding, formula and timetable for the debate.

In a damning 19-page document setting out their concerns, the advisers claim the £250,000 set aside for the project is "derisory" and will not cover the cost of a proper public debate that will have a real impact on government decisions.

The advisers also warn the whole process is not being driven by what the public really think about GM foods. Instead, it's a "top-down steering process," one that betrays "deeply embedded but flawed institutional beliefs about the public and science."

As for the timetable for the debate,...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?