Low Mutation Rate in iPSCs

The mutation rate in induced pluripotent stem cells is 10 times lower than in somatic cells, scientists show.

Written byCatherine Offord
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share

Human embryonic stem cellsWIKIMEDIA, NISSIM BENVENISTYResearchers in the U.K. have developed a technique to track and compare the mutations occurring in lab-grown somatic cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), according to a study published last week (April 7) in PLOS Genetics. Their findings reveal a lower mutation rate in iPSCs compared to lab-grown somatic cells, plus a low risk of generating cancer-related mutations while creating the stem cells, providing further support for the safety of using iPSCs in regenerative medicine.

“Until now, the question of whether generating iPS cells and growing them in cell culture creates mutations has not been addressed in detail,” study coauthor Allan Bradley of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in the U.K. said in a statement. “If human cells are really to be reprogrammed on a large scale for use in regenerative medicine then understanding the mutations the donor cells carry will be a crucial step. We now have the tools to do this.”

Previous work has shown that iPSCs exhibit relatively few mutational differences from their parent cells, but this study marks the first time that researchers have tracked the accumulation of mutations in iPSCs and somatic cells as they grow in the lab. Using cells donated by a healthy, ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Related Topics

Meet the Author

  • After undergraduate research with spiders at the University of Oxford and graduate research with ants at Princeton University, Catherine left arthropods and academia to become a science journalist. She has worked in various guises at The Scientist since 2016. As Senior Editor, she wrote articles for the online and print publications, and edited the magazine’s Notebook, Careers, and Bio Business sections. She reports on subjects ranging from cellular and molecular biology to research misconduct and science policy. Find more of her work at her website.

    View Full Profile
Share
Illustration of a developing fetus surrounded by a clear fluid with a subtle yellow tinge, representing amniotic fluid.
January 2026, Issue 1

What Is the Amniotic Fluid Composed of?

The liquid world of fetal development provides a rich source of nutrition and protection tailored to meet the needs of the growing fetus.

View this Issue
Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Skip the Wait for Protein Stability Data with Aunty

Unchained Labs
Graphic of three DNA helices in various colors

An Automated DNA-to-Data Framework for Production-Scale Sequencing

illumina
Exploring Cellular Organization with Spatial Proteomics

Exploring Cellular Organization with Spatial Proteomics

Abstract illustration of spheres with multiple layers, representing endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm derived organoids

Organoid Origins and How to Grow Them

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

Brandtech Logo

BRANDTECH Scientific Introduces the Transferpette® pro Micropipette: A New Twist on Comfort and Control

Biotium Logo

Biotium Launches GlycoLiner™ Cell Surface Glycoprotein Labeling Kits for Rapid and Selective Cell Surface Imaging

Colorful abstract spiral dot pattern on a black background

Thermo Scientific X and S Series General Purpose Centrifuges

Thermo Fisher Logo
Abstract background with red and blue laser lights

VANTAstar Flexible microplate reader with simplified workflows

BMG LABTECH