On “Geniuses” and Gender Gaps

Perceptions of a need for brilliance to excel in a field of study may contribute to its relatively low numbers of women, researchers report.

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share

FLICKR, ABOUTMODAFINIL.COMA survey of 1,820 academics across 30 different fields of study revealed that attitudes about the importance of intelligence—as opposed to hard work—may contribute to the varying gender gaps across academia. Specifically, an expectation of brilliance was found in those fields where there are still relatively few women scholars, according to the results published in Science last week (January 16).

“We’re not saying women aren’t brilliant or can’t succeed in a field that requires brilliance,” Cimpian told Science News’s Scicurious. “It’s the culture of the field that undermines representation because of stereotypes.”

The survey, conducted by Princeton philosopher Sarah-Jane Leslie, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign psychologist Andrei Cimpian, and their collaborators, aimed to uncover the underlying reasons that some fields still face a significant gender gap. In philosophy, for example, women receive fewer than 35 percent of awarded PhDs; in physics, women earn fewer than 20 percent; and in music composition, women account for only 15 percent to 16 percent. According to the survey, these were some of the very fields in which high intelligence is generally perceived as a prerequisite for success. In fields ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Jef Akst

    Jef Akst was managing editor of The Scientist, where she started as an intern in 2009 after receiving a master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses.
Share
Image of a woman in a microbiology lab whose hair is caught on fire from a Bunsen burner.
April 1, 2025, Issue 1

Bunsen Burners and Bad Hair Days

Lab safety rules dictate that one must tie back long hair. Rosemarie Hansen learned the hard way when an open flame turned her locks into a lesson.

View this Issue
Conceptual image of biochemical laboratory sample preparation showing glassware and chemical formulas in the foreground and a scientist holding a pipette in the background.

Taking the Guesswork Out of Quality Control Standards

sartorius logo
An illustration of PFAS bubbles in front of a blue sky with clouds.

PFAS: The Forever Chemicals

sartorius logo
Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

Unlocking the Unattainable in Gene Construction

dna-script-primarylogo-digital
Concept illustration of acoustic waves and ripples.

Comparing Analytical Solutions for High-Throughput Drug Discovery

sciex

Products

Atelerix

Atelerix signs exclusive agreement with MineBio to establish distribution channel for non-cryogenic cell preservation solutions in China

Green Cooling

Thermo Scientific™ Centrifuges with GreenCool Technology

Thermo Fisher Logo
Singleron Avatar

Singleron Biotechnologies and Hamilton Bonaduz AG Announce the Launch of Tensor to Advance Single Cell Sequencing Automation

Zymo Research Logo

Zymo Research Launches Research Grant to Empower Mapping the RNome