The unjust killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery, amplified by the health disparities of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ethnic disparities of the political climate, have shined a spotlight on historical and ongoing institutional racism in America. Many professional scientific organizations, such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science, March For Science, the Society for the Study of Evolution, Society for Neuroscience, and Sigma Xi have published statements opposing it. But statements have little impact unless actions result from them. Determining the most effective actions requires understanding the concept of institutional racism.
Institutional racism means that established structures within a society are infused with racial/racist ideology and practices. This includes the “enterprise” of science, which can be separated from the “method” of science. The scientific method is an objective means to better understand nature, whereas the...
If you would like to sign on to this open letter, please email Editor in Chief Bob Grant (rgrant@the-scientist.com) to add your name and affiliation to a list of signatories that will appear on this page. |
De jure segregation was still in place when African American scientists began to enter historically white research universities in noticeable numbers in the mid-20th century. Ironically, many of these institutions owed their start directly to profits generated by the slave trade. The majority of those in the first wave of black scientists, however, received their undergraduate degrees at historically black universities—institutions that were not founded from black perspectives or agendas, but rather more as social palliatives to help maintain America’s system for separation of the races and white supremacy.
In the early 1970s, acknowledging that there was a great disparity between the percentage of RSMs in the US workforce (13 percent) and their representation in science careers (2 percent), the scientific community began to intervene. Federal science funding agencies spent ~$1.5 billion on RSM-focused STEM programs from 1972 to 1992, in what were then called affirmative action programs, including the National Institutes of Health’s Minority Biomedical Research Support and Minority Access to Research Careers (MARC) programs, from which one of us (E.D.J.) directly benefited.
Although well-intentioned and producing some individual success stories, these programs did not achieve broader success in diversifying the scientific work force. Problems included insufficient oversight and assessment, poor commitment from leading faculty, inconsistent funding, lack of comprehension of behavioral/psychological impacts on student learning, recruitment of many unprepared students, and insufficient attention to the entire K–12-through-university pipeline. The oversight/assessment issue has been largely solved, and progress has been made in other arenas. But more work is needed.
Helping to stymie this progress, in the 1990s the US Supreme Court made it harder to demonstrate that discrimination against racial minorities was taking place, and more difficult to demonstrate that affirmative action policies were not harming white Americans. Ideological justifications for “race-blindness” in admissions and lawsuits claiming supposed “reverse discrimination” followed. While most of these complaints came against professional law and medical school programs, they affected other government programs in STEM. It is notable that MARC now stands for Maximizing Access to Research Careers.
We would be naive to think that racial/racist ideology is not playing a role in maintaining this injustice. This raises the question: What can people of good will do about this?
Colorblind racism and implicit bias continue to influence science careers. Colorblind racism argues that non-racial factors such as economics, naturally occurring phenomena, and the cultural attitudes of RSMs are the main cause of their social subordination. Closely aligned to colorblind racism is implicit bias. This occurs when an individual has a preference for (or aversion to) specific groups of people. This often results from ascribing stereotypes to a group without conscious knowledge of doing so. It has been argued that implicit bias plays a significant role in hindering RSMs’ success in science. In 2015, data indicated that from 1985 to 2013, RSMs were 10 to 22 percent less likely to receive a Research Award 01 (R01) grant from the NIH. This report ignited a firestorm of controversy, especially since there is still little data available to address whether this resulted from the implicit bias of reviewers or other factors. If one asks RSM researchers, most will agree from their experience that implicit bias against them has either harmed their career or made it more difficult.
One 2019 study presented data that seemingly countered that perception. Researchers reviewed a sample of R01 grant applications using a well-established implicit bias testing experimental protocol and found no evidence of racial bias, but did find gender bias. However, the “ethnic name” methods of this experiment can be questioned. For example, the use of supposed “black-sounding” names—“Darnell,” “LaToya”—may not be fully capturing the means by which RSM researchers are discriminated against. Clearly more studies are required before we can accurately assess whether this force is currently working against RSM success in the science community. Another recent study demonstrated ongoing disparities in NIH R01 awards and linked this to the practice of combining criterion scores into impact scores that disadvantaged black applicants.
Some fields are making progress towards improving diversity and inclusion in the scientific community over the last two decades. This progress has been slow, but noticeable. As noted, E.D.J. received important help from such diversity programs, but this assistance was necessary to counter the obstacles he faced in science as an African American. As reported by one of us (J.G.), the outstanding results of the BEACON (Bio/computational Evolution in Action CONsortium) Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center, are directly tied to the executive committee’s intentional mission to address diversity and inclusion. BEACON’s leadership team included three RSMs and four women in a group of 13 individuals. Progress has also come in the form of organizations such as National Research Mentoring Network, the Annual Biomedical Research Conference for Minority Students, The Black Women in Computational Biology Network, and the coalescence of groups united by social media, such as #BlackInSTEM.
Changing the demography of the scientific community may also allow us to transform the enterprise of science. Specifically, there is a crucial need to address how racial/racist ideology persists within our research programs. Examples of how racist ideology influences the biomedical and behavioral sciences are well studied but probably less known. Other cases of racial bias are beginning to emerge in other disciplines, such as computer science, where one would have hardly thought this was possible. There is now a growing literature revealing how racial bias inherent in data training sets used in artificial intelligence (AI) can introduce racial bias in AI’s outcomes.
The killing of George Floyd has revealed a deep and recalcitrant racism within American society. It permeates all of our institutions. The demography of science still lags behind the representation of RSMs in society. We would be naive to think that racial/racist ideology is not playing a role in maintaining this injustice. This raises the question: What can people of good will do about this?
Some of the answers are obvious, such as taking a stand against societal assaults on the wellbeing of RSM communities. However, others may not be so obvious, such as examining the practices within your own institution that may still harbor implicit bias against RSMs; rethinking the notion that a colorblind approach is the best way to train students and treat colleagues; deeply listening to and learning from your colleagues from RSM communities; and examining your own work and practice for any implicit racial bias. Certainly, scientists alone cannot transform societies mired in racism, but we can and must do our part to help.
Joseph Graves is a professor of biological sciences at North Carolina A&T State University and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Erich D. Jarvis is a professor in the Laboratory of Neurogenetics of Language at the Rockefeller University and is an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. They are both members of The Scientist’s editorial advisory board. You can find them on twitter @gravesjl55 and @erichjarvis.
If you would like to sign on to this open letter, please email Editor in Chief Bob Grant (rgrant@the-scientist.com) to add your name and affiliation to a list of signatories that will appear on this page.
* This commentary uses color-scheme language throughout to describe racial/ethnic groups. This is because most readers are not used to thinking about the social definitions of race and the various anthropological titles and arbitrary euphemisms associated with them. Thus, we use the principle of parallelism for racial/ethnic terms, privileging no group over the others, as described in the preface of J.L. Graves, 2005.
Resources
1. K. Ture (formerly known as Stokely Carmichael), C.V. Hamilton, Black Power: Politics of Liberation, Vintage Press, 1992 (originally published in 1967).
2. J.L. Graves, The Emperor’s New Clothes: Biological Theories of Race at the Millennium, Rutgers University Press, 2005.
3. J.L. Graves, “African Americans in evolutionary science: Where we have been and what’s next,” Evol Ed Outreach 12:18, 2019.
4. R. Dunbar-Ortiz, An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States, Beacon Press, 2014.
5. P. Dray, At the Hands of Persons Unknown: The Lynching of Black America, Random House, 2002.
6. C.S. Wilder, Ebony and Ivy: Race, Slavery, and the Troubled History of America’s Universities, Bloomsbury Press, 2013.
7. L.M. Harris et al., (eds.), Slavery and the University: Histories and Legacies, University of Georgia Press, 2019.
8. W.E.B. Du Bois, “The Field and Function of the Negro College” (1933), in The Education of Black People: Ten Critiques, 1906—1960, ed. H. Aptheker, Monthly Review Press, 1973.
9. C. Sims, “What went wrong: Why programs failed,” Science, 258:1185–87, 1992.
10. J.J. Snyder et al. “Peer-led team learning helps minority students succeed,” PLOS Biol, 14:e1002398, 2016.
11. Y. Irizarry, “Selling students short: Racial differences in teachers’ evaluations of high, average, and low performing students,” Soc Sci Res, 52:522–38, 2015.
12. M. Strasser, “The invidiousness of invidiousness: On the Supreme Court’s affirmative action jurisprudence,” Hastings Const LQ, 21:323, 1994.
13. D. O’neil Green, “Fighting the battle for racial diversity: A case study of Michigan’s institutional response to Gratz and Grutter,” Educ Policy,18:733–51, 2004.
14. J.L. Graves, “Why the nonexistence of biological races does not mean the nonexistence of racism,” Am Behav Sci, 59:1474–95, 2015.
15. J.L. Eberhardt et al., “Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes,” Psychol Sci, 17:383–86, 2006.
16. E. Check Hayden, “Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants,” Nature, 527:286–87, 2015.
17. P.S. Forscher et al., “Little race or gender bias in an experiment of initial review of NIH R01 grant proposals,” Nat Hum Behav, 3:257–64, 2019.
18. C. Kolehmainen, M. Carnes, “Who resembles a scientific leader-Jack or Jill? How implicit bias could influence research grant funding,” Circulation, 137:769–70, 2018.
19. W. Banzhaf et al., (eds.), Evolution in Action—Past, Present, and Future, Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 3–18.
20. L.E. Gómez, N. López (eds.), Mapping “Race”: Critical Approaches to Health Disparities Research, Rutgers University Press, 2013.
21. J. Zou, L. Schiebinger, “AI can be sexist and racist—it’s time to make it fair,” Nature, 559:324–26, 2018.
22. E.A. Erosheva et al., “NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores,” Sci Adv, 6:eaaz4868, 2020.
23. E.D. Jarvis, “Surviving as an underrepresented minority scientist in a majority environment,” Mol Biol of the Cell, 26:3692–96, 2017.
Signatories of this open letter:Paul Turner, Yale University Eduardo Rosa-Molinar, The University of Kansas Michael J. Proulx, University of Bath Steve W.C. Chang, Yale University Keith Gary, Bionexus KC Misha Angrist, Duke University Sakina E. Eltom, Meharry Medical College James Shorter, University of Pennsylvania Catherine A. Vandevoort, University of California, Davis John Lee, University of Georgia (emeritus) Christophe Thébaud, University of Toulouse Siobhan A. Baybrook, University of California, Los Angeles Sarah M. Tashjian, California Institute of Technology Charmaine D.M. Royal, Duke University Shahzad S. Khan, Stanford University Liliana M. Dávalos, Stony Brook University Gregory P. Copenhaver, University of North Carolina Shanker P. Reddy, United States Department of Agriculture Joel D. Levine, University of Toronto Mississauga Pamela A. Raymond, University of Michigan Kaela Singleton, Emory University Martin Stervander, University of Oregon T. Lee Gilman, Kent State University Damien Fair, University of Minnesota Daniel Vogt, Michigan State University Mush Khan, Medical University of South Carolina Peter Lipke, Brooklyn College of City University of New York Susan Perlman, University in St. Louis Tara Smith, Kent State University Jason E. Stajich, University of California, Riverside Robert Brodman, Buena Vista University Dana Dudle, DePauw University Michael Hendricks, McGill University Annie Ly, University of Colorado Boulder Jibran Y. Khokhar, University of Guelph Julian P. Meeks, University of Rochester Aimee Shen, Tufts University Randall Hayes, Agnosia Media Patricia Graham, University of Maryland, College Park Adriana Briscoe, University of California, Irvine Kamilla Venner, University of New Mexico Katie Witkiewitz, University of New Mexico R. Haven Wiley, University of North Carolina Matthew Lovett-Barron, University of California, San Diego Austin A. Coley, The Salk Institute for Biological Sciences Louise S. Mead, Michigan State University Nicholas W. Gale, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Jan Zimmermann, University of Minnesota Carlos Botero, Washington University in St. Louis Kaliris Y. Salas-Ramirez, The City College of New York Nora Mitchell, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Christopher C. Witt, University of New Mexico Alvin Holder, Old Dominion University Eve Rosenfeld, University of Buffalo Emily Weigel, Georgia Institute of Technology Olivier George, University of California, San Diego Sevinc Ercan, New York University Penny Shockett, Southeastern Louisiana University Nathaniel K. Jue, California State University, Monterey Bay Carmen S. Maldonado-Vlaar, University of Puerto Rico John Alsobrook, Adaptive Biotechnologies Susana M. Wadgymar, Davidson University Miles Berger, Duke University Christopher S. Willett, University of North Carolina Andrew Iwaniuk, University of Lethbridge Carly D. Kenkel, University of Southern California Andrea E. Martin, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Jim Heys, University of Utah Katie Schroeder, University of Massachusetts Kelsey Martin, University of California, Los Angeles Christopher Lowry, University of Colorado Boulder Deanna Church, Inscripta Carlos de Cabo de la Vega, Universitario de Albacete Kara Fitzgerald, Institute for Functional Medicine Geoffrey T. Swanson, Northwestern University Christopher M. Bartley, University of California, San Francisco Yuval Silberman, Penn State University Michelle R. Caunca, University of Miami Alexander G. Ophir, Cornell University Debra Bangasser, Temple University Troy A. Roepke, Rutgers University Stephen Matheson, Cell Reports Cindy Arrigo, New Jersey City University Stephen N. Floor, University of California, San Francisco Bruce A. Carlson, Washington University in St. Louis Zoe McElligott, University of North Carolina Michelle Ciucci, University of Wisconsin-Madison Bill Griesar, Portland State University Caroline Hu, Harvard University Patrick E. Rothwell, University of Minnesota Amanda E. Hargrove, Duke University Tessa Montague, Columbia University Nancy López, University of New Mexico Carrie Partch, University of California, Santa Cruz Brendan J. Pinto, Milwaukee Public Museum Scott Dougan, University of Georgia Sarah C. Woolley, McGill University Michael A. Taffe, University of California, San Diego Caitlilyn Allen, University of Wisconsin-Madison Christopher Sturdy, University of Alberta Giorgia Quadrato, University of Southern California Howard Neilly, STEM tutor Sadye Paez, The Rockefeller University Dar Meshi, Michigan State University Stanley Andrisse, Howard University Cliff Lingwood, University of Toronto JoAnn Trejo, University of California, San Diego Navin Pokala , New York Institute of Technology Alisa S. Wolberg, University of North Carolina Michael N. Nitaback, Yale University Georgia E. Hodes, Virginia Tech Shannon Farris, Virginia Tech John Fontenele Araujo, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Agustín Fuentes, Princeton University Julie Siegenthaler, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus Lucas Pozzo-Miller, University of Alabama at Birmingham Mark Peifer, University of North Carolina Ulises Ricoy, University of Arizona Stephen D. Shea, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Sue Ferrara, Independent writer/researcher Joshua Corbin, Children’s National Hospital Michael F. Dunn, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Erica R. Glasper, University of Maryland Steven A. Porcelli, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Nathan Anthony Smith, Children’s National Hospital Alan Goodman, Hampshire College Kate Hertweck, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Benjamin Kerr, University of Washington Jennifer A. Hamilton, Amherst College Vaughn Cooper, University of Pittsburgh Tony Gamble, Marquette University Gillian P. Durham, The Rockefeller University John Green, University of Vermont Samuel L. Diaz Muñoz, University of California, Davis Deborah L. Galson, University of Pittsburgh Tom Langen, Clarkson University Martin I. Garcia-Castro, University of California, Riverside Lisa Komoroske, University of Massachusetts Amherst Diana Williams, Florida State University Mileidy Betancourth-Cundar, Universidad de los Andes Henry L. Bart Jr., Tulane University Mirjam Knörnschild, Museum of Natural History Berlin Marjorie C. Gondré-Lewis, Howard University Stephen Machado, Oregon State University Rae Nishi, Independent scholar Michelle Blyth, Tulane University Michal Kowalewski, University of Florida Anne M. Etgen, Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Emeritus) Sharita R. Thomas, University of North Carolina Andrés Hincapié, University of North Carolina Gary M. King, Louisiana State University Melissa L. Villodas, University of North Carolina Kevin S. Jones, University of Michigan Nicolas Tritsch, New York University George M. Cherian, University of Western Ontario Harold Gainer, Marine Biological Laboratory (Emeritus) Michael J. Zigmond, University of Pittsburgh (Emeritus) William F. Flack, Jr., Bucknell University Tessa M. Andrews, University of Georgia Lee Phillips, University of Carolina at Greensboro Keith A. Crandall, George Washington University Jamaine S. Davis, Meharry Medical College Dawn Noggle, Community Medical Services Derek Daniels, University at Buffalo Susan Mykalcio, Cisco Systems Peeyush K. Lala, University of Western Ontario (Emeritus) James Liljestrand, Retired physician Angela Fang, Massachusetts General Hospital Eric Feczko, University of Minnesota Mark S. Springer, University of California, Riverside Agnès Lacreuse, University of Massachusetts Amherst Nagamani Balagurusamy, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila Stuart Magoon, City of Tacoma, WA Aylin Rodan, University of Utah Daniel L. Gonzales, Purdue University Remi Geohegan, University of Maine Orono Constantina Theofanopoulou, Rockefeller University Hector Rasgado-Flores, Rosalind Franklin University Eric A. Webb, University of Southern California Jon T. Sakata, McGill University Michael S. Gaffrey, Duke University Desmond Schatz, University of Florida Keith A. Trujillo, California State University San Marcos Maurine Neiman, University of Iowa Jeannine M. Lessmann, Eckerd College Erick Guerrero, I-LEAD Institute Andrea L. Sweigart, University of Georgia Rachel Luu, Immunomind Pamela J. Lein, University of California, Davis Warren (Lauren) Foster, McMaster University Luke Remage-Healey, University of Massachusetts Gail E. Christie, Virginia Commonwealth University Mats W. Johansson, University of Wisconsin Paul Shapiro, University of Maryland Magdia De Jesus, Pfizer Jessica Cantlon, Carnegie Mellon University Janet M. Dubinsky, University of Minnesota Hilmar Lapp, Duke University Tristram Wyatt, University of Oxford Jay Labov, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (retired) Tamarind N. Stewart, North Carolina A&T State University Steven Wiley, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Mark Sheldon, Northwestern University Anna Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University Marsha Bates, Rutgers University Willie L. Davis, Loma Linda University Connie J. Mulligan, University of Florida Rodylyn Ferry, University of Toronto Melanie M. Cooper, Michigan State University Athula H. Wikramanayake, University of Miami Mark S. Parcells, University of Delaware Elsbeth Walker, University of Massachusetts Amherst Arianna Maffei, Stony Brook University Edward Levine, Vanderbilt University Gordon Edwards, National Physical Laboratory, UK (Emeritus) Cynthia Norton, St. Catherine University Barbara Fingleton, Vanderbilt University Laura Buttitta, University of Michigan Harold Geller, George Mason University (retired) Amy Paller, Northwestern University Katharine A. Muirhead, SciGro Christopher Nicchitta, Duke University Robert Howell, West Virginia University Susan V. Westmoreland, AbbVie Neena Grover, Colorado College Juliana Lott de Carvalho, University of Brasilia Julio J. Ramirez, Davidson College Jeff Conner, Michigan State University Melissa Petreaca, The Ohio State University Marlene Behrmann, Carnegie Mellon University David L. Remington, University of North Carolina at Greensboro Mariana Emerenciano, Instituto Nacional de Cancer (Brazil) Mary Beth Decker, Yale University Suzanne Scarlata, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Steven J. Fliesler, University at Buffalo Glenn A. Herrick, University of Utah (Emeritus) David Andow, University of Minnesota Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk, Harvard University Anura Rambukkana, University of Edinburgh Walter K. Schmidt, University of Georgia Allison E, Radwick, West Pharmaceutical Services Valarie A. Barr Agustin Rojas-Muñoz, Stanford University Jenna Schardt, Allen Institute for Brain Science Kody Manke, Carnegie Mellon University Srinivasan Ramachandran, University of California, San Diego Grace Williams, Allen Institute for Brain Science Sergio Adamo, University of Rome Lori M. Kelman, Montgomery College Zachary A. Wood, University of Georgia Simon H. Waters, Simon W Design Bosiljka Tasic, Allen Institute for Brain Science Lance Wells, University of Georgia Bruce A. O’Gara, Humboldt State University Rita Shiang, Virginia Commonwealth University Denise Carbonaro Sarracino, University of California, Los Angeles Liliane Cambraia Windsor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Martha C. Zúñiga, University of California, Santa Cruz Chante Cox-Boyd, Carnegie Mellon University Abd Khasawinah, US Environmental Protection Agency (retired) Lion Uhl, University of Oxford Stephen Richards, University of California, Davis Frances Skinner, Krembil Research Institute/University Health Network David Ribble, Trinity University Alyce DeMarais, University of Puget Sound Lisa K. Elfring, University of Arizona Kathleen Marrs, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Melissa S. Brady, College of American Pathologists Gina M. Semprebon, Bay Path University Kathryn G. Miller, Washington University in St. Louis Pamela Pape-Lindstrom, Harford Community College Erik Maronde, Goethe University David Marcey, California Lutheran University Christopher Parker, Texas Wesleyan University Monica Linden, Brown University Davida S. Smyth, The New School Katayoun Chamany, The New School John G. Foley, Indiana University Christina Hirota, University of Calgary David Weiss, University of Iowa Donita Lynn Robinson, University of North Carolina Alan H. McGowan, The New School Shanker P. Reddy, US Department of Agriculture Marit Nilsen-Hamilton, Iowa State University Elizabeth Vallen, Swarthmore College Jon L. Norenburg, Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History André Fenton, New York University Nicolette Caperello, University of California, Davis Trygve Bakken, Allen Institute for Brain Science Stephen A. Braimah, Pest Control Consultant Alexandra de Sousa, Bath Spa University Zsuzsa Kaldy, University of Massachusetts Boston Jean Busboom, Univar Solutions Amy Bernard, Allen Institute for Brain Science Charles J. Malemud, Case Western Reserve University Henry Komadowski, Lethbridge College Mbemba Jabbi, University of Texas at Austin Darleana McHenry, St. Carries Center SMART Academy Corrie Moreau, Cornell University Melissa DeBiasse, University of California, Merced Michele Markstein, University of Massachusetts Amherst Loren Cassin-Sackett, University of Louisiana Martin Samuels, Harvard University |