Skip to main content

First STAP Report Released

Questions of whether the stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency papers will be retracted linger as RIKEN makes public its initial investigation, finding no evidence of scientific misconduct.

Written byTracy Vence
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

WIKIMEDIA, JULOLast week (March 11), Teruhiko Wakayama of Yamanashi University, one of the scientists behind the stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) studies led by researchers at the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology and published in Nature in January, requested that the work be pulled from the literature. And in a March 14 press release, RIKEN said that the committee tasked with examining the studies “concluded that there had been inappropriate handling of data for two of the items under investigation, but the circumstances were not judged to constitute research misconduct.” During a press conference held that same day in Tokyo, RIKEN President Ryoji Noyori expressed his personal concerns surrounding the STAP controversy.

“I would like, first and foremost, to express my deepest regrets that articles published in Nature by RIKEN scientists are bringing into question the credibility of the scientific community,” Noyori said in a statement, adding: “The reproducibility and credibility of the STAP phenomenon must be rigorously validated, not only by RIKEN scientists, but also by others.” Several groups have reported trouble reproducing the method, which was once touted as a “simple” approach to reprogramming differentiated cells to a stem-like state.

The RIKEN investigation of the work continues, but for its part, Nature explained that it typically tries to get all authors on to agree on retracting published papers. “In cases where not all of the authors agree on a retraction, Nature evaluates whether the evidence ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Related Topics

Related articles background image
The Scientist Digest cover September 2026
September 2026

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

A new system that enables researchers to uniquely tag monoclonal antibodies for use in microscopy could help simplify complex imaging studies.

View this Issue
Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Alamar Biosciences logo
Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Bio-Rad
Beyond the Basics: Strategies for Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis

Beyond the Basics: Strategies for Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis

bioxcell
Scientist reviewing cellular and molecular data on a computer in a laboratory.

Building Translation-Ready Biomarkers with Connected Workflows

Danaher Logo

Products

Closeup image of a multi channel pipette dispensing pink liquid into a 96-well plate.

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Integra Logo
Single cells in suspension

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

Corning logo
Abstract image representing cell membranes linked together.

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Biotium
sino biological logo

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays