US Researchers Found Guilty of Misconduct Collectively Awarded $101 Million

Seventeen scientists found to have committed research misconduct during the last 25 years have since collectively received more than $101 million in NIH funding.

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share

FLICKR, ERVINS STRAUHMANISResearchers found guilty of scientific misconduct by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) went on to collectively receive $101 million from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), according to a study published this month (February 1) in the Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. The authors also found that 47.2 percent of the researchers found guilty of misconduct they examined continue to publish studies.

“I knew from my work and reading other studies that careers after misconduct were possible,” coauthor Kyle Galbraith, a research integrity officer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, told Science. “But the volume kind of shocked me.”

Galbraith and colleagues identified 284 researchers who were sanctioned by HHS for misconduct during the last 25 years, then scoured public databases to determine how many of these researchers continued publishing studies after their verdicts. The team found that nearly half had published at least one study after their sanctions. Only 8 percent went on to receive NIH funding, but did so prolifically—17 researchers within this group collectively won $101 million in publicly funded grants, the team reported.

Thirteen of these 17 had already been receiving NIH ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • Joshua A. Krisch

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
TS Digest January 2025
January 2025, Issue 1

Why Do Some People Get Drunk Faster Than Others?

Genetics and tolerance shake up how alcohol affects each person, creating a unique cocktail of experiences.

View this Issue
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino
New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

Biotium logo
Learn How 3D Cell Cultures Advance Tissue Regeneration

Organoids as a Tool for Tissue Regeneration Research 

Acro 

Products

Sapient Logo

Sapient Partners with Alamar Biosciences to Extend Targeted Proteomics Services Using NULISA™ Assays for Cytokines, Chemokines, and Inflammatory Mediators

Bio-Rad Logo

Bio-Rad Extends Range of Vericheck ddPCR Empty-Full Capsid Kits to Optimize AAV Vector Characterization

An illustration of different-shaped bacteria.

Leveraging PCR for Rapid Sterility Testing

Conceptual 3D image of DNA on a blue background.

Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of qPCR Assay Controls 

Bio-Rad