One of the many things that disheartens me about the COVID-19 pandemic is how a public health emergency fractured our world when it should have united it. The reality of a novel virus ravaging the global population, leaving millions of bodies in its wake, is something that, at least in my view, should have been viewed as a matter of fact, not of opinion. But very early on in the strange journey of the past two-plus years, people seemed to choose conceptual and behavioral sides: lab leak vs. zoonotic origin, masks vs. bare faces, broadly accepted evidence vs. conspiracy theory. This division reached fever pitch with the authorization of a handful of COVID-19 vaccines in this country and around the world. Indeed, the pandemic has proven to be fertile ground not only for widely disparate opinions about the nature of the situation but for misinformation and aggression. That said, no ...
Editorial: When Will This Pandemic Officially End?
And does it even matter?


The Scientist ARCHIVES
Become a Member of
Related Topics
Meet the Author

From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.
View Full Profile



















