Skip to main content

No Transgenerational Effects of Chernobyl Radiation Found

The genomes of the children of people exposed to fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear accident appear to carry no trace of the incident.

Written byAbby Olena, PhD
| 4 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

ABOVE: Aerial view of the Chernobyl nuclear power station
© ISTOCK.COM, DESID

On April 26, 1986, an accident at the nuclear power station in Chernobyl, Ukraine, released huge amounts of radioactive material into the environment. The radiation not only affected the surrounding areas but was carried by rain clouds to places as far away as Great Britain and Sweden. In a study published today (April 22) in Science, researchers found no evidence for transgenerational genetic effects on the children of people exposed to the accident’s radiation.

In a companion paper, the same set of investigators studied the development of papillary thyroid cancer, one of the most common cancers in Chernobyl survivors, and determined that thyroid tumors develop due to radiation-induced double-stranded DNA breaks.

Much of what researchers know about how the fallout affected genetic material comes from epidemiological data, says Anna Poetsch, who studies DNA damage and repair at Dresden University ...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • abby olena

    As a freelancer for The Scientist, Abby reports on new developments in life science for the website. She has a PhD from Vanderbilt University and got her start in science journalism as the Chicago Tribune’s AAAS Mass Media Fellow in 2013. Following a stint as an intern for The Scientist, Abby was a postdoc in science communication at Duke University, where she developed and taught courses to help scientists share their research. In addition to her work as a science journalist, she leads science writing and communication workshops and co-produces a conversational podcast. She is based in Alabama.  

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Related articles background image
The Scientist Digest cover September 2026
September 2026

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

A new system that enables researchers to uniquely tag monoclonal antibodies for use in microscopy could help simplify complex imaging studies.

View this Issue
Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

EpiCypher Logo
Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Alamar Biosciences logo
Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Miltenyi
Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Bio-Rad

Products

Closeup image of a multi channel pipette dispensing pink liquid into a 96-well plate.

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Integra Logo
Single cells in suspension

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

Corning logo
Abstract image representing cell membranes linked together.

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Biotium
sino biological logo

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays