The biomechanical effects of large sinuses in a cave bear (Ursus ingressus; right) compared to the living brown bear (U. arctos; left). The video shows the stress (represented by orange and red regions and thicker arrows) created by biting scenarios involving different teeth, namely, canine, fourth upper premolar (P4), first upper molar (M1), and second upper molar (M2). When the researchers removed the sinuses from the three-dimensional models to study how large sinus cavities affect skull geometry and feeding biomechanics (skulls labeled “Without sinus”), they found that the stiffness of the cave bear skull increased. This suggests that the bears’ large sinuses decreased the structural stability of their skulls, which impaired their ability to break down food with their front teeth and confined them to an herbivorous diet.
Dr. Alejandro Pérez-Ramos, Area de Paleontología, Departamento de Ecología y Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga


The authors of the paper argue that the combination of both long periods of hibernation and a restrictive diet may have ultimately led to the cave bears’ demise.

A. Pérez-Ramos et al., “Biomechanical simulations reveal a trade-off between adaptation to glacial climate and dietary niche versatility in European cave bears,” Science Advances, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9462, 2020.

Interested in reading more?

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?