Specialized Brain Circuit Makes Mice Itchy When They See Others Scratch

A previously undetected pathway in the mouse brain bypasses the visual cortex to directly activate contagious itch.

black and white image of young man in sunglasses with trees in background
| 4 min read
Drawing of a mouse scratching itself after watching a video of a different mouse scratching itself.<br><br>

CHEN LAB

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00
Share

Mice, like people, are social creatures that tend to emulate the behaviors of their family or community. So, when a mouse gets itchy, others around it will start to scratch as well—a phenomenon called contagious itch that also occurs in humans and other animals.

A brown mouse facing the camera uses a hind leg to itch behind its ear.
THOMAS EARNEST, NIDCR

Contagious itch serves an important purpose, explains Zhou-Feng Chen, who studies itch at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. Mice have notoriously bad eyesight, he says, and therefore “they cannot see mosquitos; they cannot see insects. But if other mice are scratching, you better scratch.”

In a study published October 4 in Cell Reports, Chen and his colleagues probed the neural circuitry driving contagious itch in mice, which he says likely differs from that of humans due to the comparative complexity of our brains. The team found a previously unreported visual circuit in the brain that appears to be responsible for detecting certain types of movement (in this case, a fellow mouse scratching), starting in the retina and ending in a brain region that plays an important role in guiding several autonomic processes. Unlike nearly all other known pathways involved in visual processing, the newly discovered circuit bypasses the visual cortex.

This wasn’t the lab’s first foray into uncovering the neural basis for contagious itch behaviors. In a Science study from 2017, the team tracked these behaviors to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a cluster of neurons in the hypothalamus that are activated when mice watch other mice scratch themselves. The new study was meant to piece together how visual input triggers that activation.

To identify the brain areas activated by seeing scratching, the researchers injected an immunostaining virus into the SCN of live mice, which allowed them to track the structure and activity of the region’s upstream and downstream projections using in vivo calcium imaging. They then played the mice one of two videos: one showed a mouse walking around, and the other showed a mouse scratching itself.

Both videos, Chen emphasizes, showed a mouse as it would be seen from the perspective of another, allowing the team to observe the lab mice behaving as they would around actual itchy mice. “I think that we need to imagine what an animal can see,” he says. “And play some real [things] they actually care about. . . . We have to understand mouse visual systems from the rodent’s perspective.”

See “CRACK Method Reveals Novel Neuron Type in Mouse Brain

The results showed that intrinsically photosensitive retina ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the eye detect the motion of a fellow rodent scratching itself and pass along the signal to the SCN. The team found in their 2017 study that some SCN neurons trigger the release of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), which has long been associated with itching, and that activates other SCN neurons carrying GRP receptors, which then propagate the signal to the ending of the pathway: the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT), which seems to trigger the itching behavior itself.

In the new study, the team also tested mice that were injected with an engineered virus that modified their genomes to inhibit the ipRGCs that projected to their SCNs. When these mice viewed the scratching video, they did not show any contagious itch behaviors despite otherwise behaving the same as mice with active ipRGCs—demonstrating that these cells and the SCN are indeed required for contagious itching, the authors write in their paper. Similar inhibition of cells in the visual cortex and other brain regions commonly associated with vision had no effect on contagious itch, which suggests that they’re not involved in the pathway.

These experiments showed that the newly discovered pathway “is required and enough to mediate contagious itch behavior,” Parisa Gazerani, who studies pain and contagious itch at Aalborg University in Denmark but didn’t work on the new study, tells The Scientist over email. “I think the researchers have provided a piece of groundbreaking evidence (at behavioral, and cellular-molecular levels) on the pathway involved in the contagious itch.”

Chen says he’s received criticism from other researchers who find it hard to believe that the visual cortex isn’t involved in the contagious itch pathway, given that it begins with a visual stimulus. He explains that the contagious itch visual pathway likely evolved before the emergence of a cortex. The brain regions it involves, such as the thalamus and hypothalamus, are far more ancient. He adds that humans have a lower percentage of ipRGCs in our eyes than mice do, indicating that human photoreceptors changed as our visual cortex evolved.

Gazerani notes that the finding highlights the difficulty of determining how contagious itch is triggered across species. In humans, itch can be set off by sight, sound, conversation, or even thought, she says, indicating that more-complicated neural pathways are at play than the one Chen and his colleagues found. That illustrates that we can’t necessarily draw conclusions about human itch based on mouse studies—or vice versa.

“Some of those pathways can be tested in animal models if [studies] are designed to address the nonvisual pathways, such as auditory,” Gazerani says. “However, the higher cognitive aspects are challenging to test in rodents—for example . . . the conversation about itch between two or more humans cannot be modeled. . . . Animal models can certainly help us understand some mechanistic aspects in detail that might not be possible to study in humans due to ethical and practical limitations.”

Keywords

Meet the Author

  • black and white image of young man in sunglasses with trees in background

    Dan Robitzski

    Dan is a News Editor at The Scientist. He writes and edits for the news desk and oversees the “The Literature” and “Modus Operandi” sections of the monthly TS Digest and quarterly print magazine. He has a background in neuroscience and earned his master's in science journalism at New York University.
Share
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
TS Digest January 2025
January 2025, Issue 1

Why Do Some People Get Drunk Faster Than Others?

Genetics and tolerance shake up how alcohol affects each person, creating a unique cocktail of experiences.

View this Issue
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino
New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

Biotium logo
Learn How 3D Cell Cultures Advance Tissue Regeneration

Organoids as a Tool for Tissue Regeneration Research 

Acro&nbsp;

Products

Conceptual 3D image of DNA on a blue background.

Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of qPCR Assay Controls 

Bio-Rad
Takara Bio

Takara Bio USA Holdings, Inc. announces the acquisition of Curio Bioscience, adding spatial biology to its broad portfolio of single-cell omics solutions

Sapio Sciences

Sapio Sciences Announces Enhanced Capabilities for Chemistry, Immunogenicity, GMP and Molecular Biology

Biotium Logo

Biotium Unveils the Most Sensitive Stains for DNA or RNA with New EMBER™ Ultra Agarose Gel Kits